Introduction
What is your name?
Name
(Required)
Mr Adam Key
Section 1: Site Promoter's Contact Details
Company/Organisation (if applicable)
Company/Organisation (if applicable)?
Levens Hall Farms Limited
Interest in Site
Please select all that apply
(Required)
Checkbox:
Ticked
Landowner
Checkbox:
Unticked
Land Agent
Checkbox:
Unticked
Parish Council
Checkbox:
Unticked
Community Group
Checkbox:
Unticked
Planning Consultant
Checkbox:
Unticked
Developer
Checkbox:
Unticked
Local Resident
Checkbox:
Unticked
Registered Social Landlord
Checkbox:
Unticked
Other
Section 2: Agent Details
Contact Name
Contact Name
Mr Adam Key
Company/Organisation (if applicable)
Company/Organisation (if applicable)
Savills (UK) Ltd
Section 3: Site Information
Site location
Address
(Required)
Land at Scroggs Wood, Kendal
Postcode
(Required)
LA9 5RL
Grid reference
Easting
(Required)
350948
Northing
(Required)
489843
Site area - whole site
Hectares
(Required)
18
Site area - area suitable for development
Hectares
(Required)
18
Current land use and character
Current land use and character
(Required)
Agriculture
Character and land uses of surrounding area
Character and land uses of surrounding area
(Required)
The residential settlement edge of Kendal is located directly adjacent to the north of the site, with agricultural land to the east, south and west.
Relevant planning history on site
Relevant planning history on site
The site is allocated within the current Local Plan Allocations DPD as a Strategic Employment site (LA2.9).
SO/2019/0001 An EIA scoping opinion was submitted relating to the site and a forthcoming application for mixed use development. It was determined that EIA was required.
Several pre-application (IE/2018/0010) discussions have been undertaken with SLDC officers who agreed that some ‘enabling’ residential development will facilitate the delivery of the employment site.
SO/2019/0001 An EIA scoping opinion was submitted relating to the site and a forthcoming application for mixed use development. It was determined that EIA was required.
Several pre-application (IE/2018/0010) discussions have been undertaken with SLDC officers who agreed that some ‘enabling’ residential development will facilitate the delivery of the employment site.
Is the site greenfield or brownfield (previously developed land)?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Greenfield
Radio button:
Unticked
Brownfield
Radio button:
Unticked
Mixed
Additional Brownfield Site Questions (complete if applicable)
The land is/was occupied by a permanent structure and any associated fixed surface infrastructure and this has not blended into the landscape in the process of time. True Radio button: Not checked True | The land is/was occupied by a permanent structure and any associated fixed surface infrastructure and this has not blended into the landscape in the process of time. False Radio button: Checked False | The land is/was occupied by a permanent structure and any associated fixed surface infrastructure and this has not blended into the landscape in the process of time. Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
The land is not/has not been occupied by agricultural or forestry buildings. True Radio button: Checked True | The land is not/has not been occupied by agricultural or forestry buildings. False Radio button: Not checked False | The land is not/has not been occupied by agricultural or forestry buildings. Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
The land is not a formal minerals or waste extraction or disposal site with restoration conditions. True Radio button: Checked True | The land is not a formal minerals or waste extraction or disposal site with restoration conditions. False Radio button: Not checked False | The land is not a formal minerals or waste extraction or disposal site with restoration conditions. Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
The land is not a residential garden, park, recreation ground or allotment in a built up area. True Radio button: Checked True | The land is not a residential garden, park, recreation ground or allotment in a built up area. False Radio button: Not checked False | The land is not a residential garden, park, recreation ground or allotment in a built up area. Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Section 4: Proposed Use
Proposed Use
Please select all that apply
(Required)
Checkbox:
Unticked
Residential
Checkbox:
Unticked
Employment/Business
Checkbox:
Ticked
Mixed Use
Checkbox:
Unticked
Other
Additional information on proposed development
Information
(Required)
This site is an existing employment development opportunity within the adopted Local Plan. Going forward in the next Local Plan we propose that flexibility is built into the allocation with potential for mixed uses. The pre-applications discussions with SLDC have focused on introducing other uses, particularly residential, in order to make the site viable by delivering infrastructure. It is too early to be prescriptive on the precise break down / mix of uses, but employment, residential and other ancillary uses will be the key components. Any scheme will be landscape led.
Section 5: Site Suitability, Constraints and Impacts
Does the site have highways access or can safe access be achieved?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
Vehicular access into the site would be achieved from the A6 Milnthorpe Road and the A591. An access strategy would be developed, taking into account national and/or local design guidance such as 'Manual for Streets' and the 'Cumbria Design Guide'. Agreement on the principle of an access strategy to the site would be sought with Cumbria County Council, as the Local Highway Authority, through the planning application process. Waterman have undertaken initial highways assessments to demonstrate this proposed access point is achievable.
Is the site steeply sloping or does it have other topographical or land stability challenges?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
The site is sloping in aspect (see Figure 1.1) and gradually falls from west to east. The topography will be a major driver of the design approach, but it should not be considered as a constraint.
Are there any known utilities or infrastructure installations under/over the site that would present a constraint?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
There are no known constraints to the provision of gas, electricity, waste water or water supply on the site, although the precise means of supply and connection will be confirmed through discussions with the relevant utility bodies as part of any planning application
Does the site have access to the following utilities (or could they readily be provided)?
(Required) | |||
Mains water supply Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Mains water supply Could readily be provided Radio button: Checked Could readily be provided | Mains water supply No Radio button: Not checked No | Mains water supply Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Mains sewerage Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Mains sewerage Could readily be provided Radio button: Checked Could readily be provided | Mains sewerage No Radio button: Not checked No | Mains sewerage Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Electrical supply Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Electrical supply Could readily be provided Radio button: Checked Could readily be provided | Electrical supply No Radio button: Not checked No | Electrical supply Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Gas supply Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Gas supply Could readily be provided Radio button: Checked Could readily be provided | Gas supply No Radio button: Not checked No | Gas supply Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Landline telephone Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Landline telephone Could readily be provided Radio button: Checked Could readily be provided | Landline telephone No Radio button: Not checked No | Landline telephone Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Superfast Fibre broadband Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Superfast Fibre broadband Could readily be provided Radio button: Checked Could readily be provided | Superfast Fibre broadband No Radio button: Not checked No | Superfast Fibre broadband Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Are there any existing landscape features on the site?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
The River Kent lies to the east of the site and there is a watercourse running through the centre of the site which feeds into the River.
A number of trees are located adjacent to the south west boundary, and there are a handful of individual trees adjoining the west, south and east boundaries.
The site contains a hedgerow separating the north and south field
Initial technical work has demonstrated these features can be easily incorporated into the design of any proposed development
A number of trees are located adjacent to the south west boundary, and there are a handful of individual trees adjoining the west, south and east boundaries.
The site contains a hedgerow separating the north and south field
Initial technical work has demonstrated these features can be easily incorporated into the design of any proposed development
What Environment Agency flood zone is the site within?
What Environment Agency flood zone is the site within?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Flood Zone 1
Radio button:
Unticked
Flood Zone 2
Radio button:
Unticked
Flood Zone 3
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
The vast majority of the site is Flood Zone 1. A small portion of the site (South East area) is within Flood Zone 2/3a. Development on the part of the site that falls within Zone 2/3a will be avoided.
Is the site vulnerable to surface water flooding?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Is the site subject to, or at risk from any forms of pollution, contamination or hazards?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Are there any designated or locally important nature or geological sites within or adjacent to the site?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
There are no designated or locally important nature or geological sites within or directly adjacent to the site however the River Kent- Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Area of Conservation (SAC) is located circa 50m east of the site.
Does the site, or could it potentially, provide suitable habitat(s) for protected species?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Ticked
Don't know
Is the site well related to an existing settlement?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Within an existing settlement
Radio button:
Ticked
On the edge of an existing settlement
Radio button:
Unticked
Not related to an existing settlement
Comments
The site is located adjacent to the settlement of Kendal
Does the site have good access to a range of facilities and services within a reasonable walking distance or by public transport?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
A good range of facilities
Radio button:
Unticked
A limited range of facilities
Radio button:
Unticked
No facilities
Comments (list facilities and travel times/distances)
Kendal Town Centre is located circa 1.5 miles north of the site. Kendal is home to a number of shops, restaurants, pubs, community facilities, doctors surgeries, schools and a train station.
Are there trees on or adjacent to the site that are subject to Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs)?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Do any public rights of way pass through or close to the site?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
There is a public right of way through Scroggs Wood to the north of the site. This provides a link to the right of way to the east of the site which provides access to Kendal Town Centre (via west bank of River Kent) and the open countryside to the south of the site.
Is the site currently used for sport or recreation?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Are there any particular access rights over the land?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Is the site within or adjacent to a Conservation Area?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Are there any listed buildings within or surrounding the site?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
Helsington Laithes Manor Grade II* listed building lies to the west of the site. Helsington Snuff Mills Grade II listed building lies to the east of the site. The planning application will be accompanied by a Heritage Assessment to demonstrate how these assets will be safeguarded (with respect to their qualities and setting).
Are there any scheduled monuments within or adjacent to the site?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Could there be any potential land use conflicts if this site is developed for its proposed use?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
How will the site respond to the climate emergency that has been declared by the Council?
Comments
(Required)
It has already been agreed through a formal EIA scoping process that any planning application will be accompanied by an Environmental Statement.
A Flood Risk Assessment will be prepared and submitted in support of any planning application which will confirm that surface run-off will not exceed existing greenfield run-off rates including an allowance for climate change.
The site provides the opportunity for a development that promotes high standards of energy efficiency and sustainable techniques in building design and respects the site's special qualities including enhancement of Scroggs Wood, and retention of natural landforms with significant landscaping and green areas.
A Flood Risk Assessment will be prepared and submitted in support of any planning application which will confirm that surface run-off will not exceed existing greenfield run-off rates including an allowance for climate change.
The site provides the opportunity for a development that promotes high standards of energy efficiency and sustainable techniques in building design and respects the site's special qualities including enhancement of Scroggs Wood, and retention of natural landforms with significant landscaping and green areas.
What social, economic and environmental benefits would the development of this site provide for South Lakeland and our communities?
Comments
(Required)
The employment element of the proposed site will deliver much needed employment opportunities to the area, making provision for, and encouraging SMEs.
A possible mixed use development on the Land at Scroggs Wood would provide a number of houses, meeting the identified needs of South Lakeland, as well as an appropriate housing mix.
The site would be developed to be in keeping with its rural location, with low density development and incorporating green corridors across the site. Significant areas of both formal and informal green space can be created given the size and nature of the site.
New pedestrian and cycle links to Kendal from the site will increase connectivity and encourage sustainable travel and healthy lifestyles.
A possible mixed use development on the Land at Scroggs Wood would provide a number of houses, meeting the identified needs of South Lakeland, as well as an appropriate housing mix.
The site would be developed to be in keeping with its rural location, with low density development and incorporating green corridors across the site. Significant areas of both formal and informal green space can be created given the size and nature of the site.
New pedestrian and cycle links to Kendal from the site will increase connectivity and encourage sustainable travel and healthy lifestyles.
Section 6: Site Ownership and Availability
Status of site ownership
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Sole owner of the whole site
Radio button:
Unticked
Part owner of the whole site
Radio button:
Unticked
Owner/part owner of a portion of the site
Do any of the issues below affect the site?
(Required) | ||
Multiple ownership issues Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Multiple ownership issues No Radio button: Checked No | Multiple ownership issues Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Third party land interests Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Third party land interests No Radio button: Checked No | Third party land interests Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Ransom strips Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Ransom strips No Radio button: Checked No | Ransom strips Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Restrictive covenants Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Restrictive covenants No Radio button: Checked No | Restrictive covenants Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Current use needs to be relocated Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Current use needs to be relocated No Radio button: Checked No | Current use needs to be relocated Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Tenancy issues Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Tenancy issues No Radio button: Checked No | Tenancy issues Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Minerals rights Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Minerals rights No Radio button: Checked No | Minerals rights Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Other Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Other No Radio button: Checked No | Other Unsure Radio button: Not checked Unsure |
Please indicate the approximate timescale for availability
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Immediately
Radio button:
Unticked
Up to 5 years
Radio button:
Unticked
5 - 10 years
Radio button:
Unticked
10 - 15 years
Radio button:
Unticked
Beyond 15 years
Any other comments, particularly if you have indicated that the site is not immediately available, please explain why
A number of pre-application discussions have already been undertaken with SLDC and preparation of a planning application is underway. It is envisaged that development will commence on site within the first 5 years of the plan period.
Section 7: Achievability
Has the site been marketed to potential developers?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Site is owned by a developer
Radio button:
Ticked
Site is under option to a developer
Radio button:
Unticked
Enquiries received
Radio button:
Unticked
Site is being marketed
Radio button:
Unticked
No activity
Radio button:
Unticked
Not Known
What is the likely timescale for the development of the site?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Within 5 years
Radio button:
Unticked
6 - 10 years
Radio button:
Unticked
11 - 15 years
Radio button:
Unticked
Beyond 15 years
If any constraints have been identified, are they likely to affect the achievability/timing of the development?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
We do not consider there are any insurmountable constraints which would prevent the development of the site
Are there any viability issues or abnormal costs that could affect the development?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
For residential proposals, is the site capable of meeting the Council’s existing Local Plan policy requirements, for example affordable housing requirements?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Comments
Savills have previously made representations regarding concerns over the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) calculation of housing need. The adopted Local Plan includes a housing requirement figure of 400 dwellings per year (Core Strategy Policy CS6.1) over the plan period 2003-2025 whereas the 2017 SHMA contained an Objectively Assessed Need (OAN) figure of up to 290 dwellings per year. This is a significant change which resulted in SLDC making the working assumption that a ‘limited quantity’ of new housing land will be required in the new Local Plan. As forecast through our previous representations, the revised Standard Methodology for calculating OAN (Standard Method 2), published by Central Government has increased the housing requirement for South Lakeland to 410 dwellings per annum. Given that the new Local Plan is envisaged to cover the period until 2040, it is essential that the OAN figures are robustly reviewed in line with the government projections before progressing the plan further because it is an important foundation stone of the whole process. The Land at Scroggs Wood has been identified as suitable for mixed use development, we have demonstrated that it is deliverable and developable in line with the NPPF and it is located in close proximity to the existing settlement of Kendal. As such, we respectfully request it is allocated for employment led, mixed use through the emerging Local Plan.